Sending the problem back to the customer
Wieland Metal Services · Operations Manager · 2025–2026
- What it is
- A written notice to a customer shipping us coil, naming three recurring problems with their loads — incomplete paperwork, coil cores narrower than the metal, and weights that didn't match the coils — and stating exactly what had to change.
- Why it existed
- We were absorbing their errors. Unwinding and rewinding coil to our standard sizes, re-weighing loads to get a traceable number, chasing documents before we could even receive the truck. None of it was billed, and all of it was quietly becoming normal.
- What changed
- The evidence came off the receiving inspection reports on the card above, so the problems were named with dates behind them rather than as a complaint. The courtesy was put on the record as a courtesy — "it cannot be relied upon going forward" — and the letter closed by offering help implementing the change. Firm enough to stop the cost, written to keep the account.
What we were absorbing
- Shipments arriving without a packing slip, bill of lading, or the other documents needed to accept the goods
- Coil cores narrower than the metal wound on them, forcing us to unwind and rewind to our standard sizes — avoidable handling and a quality risk
- Weights on the paperwork that didn't match the coils, forcing a re-weigh to keep documentation and traceability accurate
What we asked them to do
- Send complete documentation with every shipment
- Make the core width match the stated coil width — on the coil and on the production and packaging documents
- Make the recorded weight match the actual weight shown on the coil
The letter as it went out. The customer is not named here.